Notre Dame London: Fischer Hall Library
Image from Google Jackets

Genocide and the Europeans / Karen E. Smith.

By: Smith, Karen ElizabethPublication details: New York : Cambridge University Press, 2010. Description: ix, 278 p. ; 23 cmISBN: 9780521116350 (alk. paper); 052111635X (alk. paper); 9780521133296 (pbk. : alk. paper); 0521133297 (pbk. : alk. paper)Subject(s): Genocide -- History -- 21st century | Genocide -- Case studies | Europeans -- AttitudesDDC classification: 364.15/1094 LOC classification: HV6322.7 | .S64 2010
Contents:
Machine generated contents note: 1. The norms against genocide; 2. European governments and the development of the international legal framework on genocide; 3. European discourses on genocide during the Cold War; 4. Bosnia and Herzegovina; 5. Rwanda; 6. Kosovo; 7. Darfur; 8. Is there a European way of responding to genocide?
Summary: "Genocide is one of the most heinous abuses of human rights imaginable, yet reaction to it by European governments in the post-Cold War world has been criticised for not matching the severity of the crime. European governments rarely agree on whether to call a situation genocide, and responses to purported genocides have often been limited to delivering humanitarian aid to victims and supporting prosecution of perpetrators in international criminal tribunals. More coercive measures - including sanctions or military intervention - are usually rejected as infeasible or unnecessary. This book explores the European approach to genocide, reviewing government attitudes towards the negotiation and ratification of the 1948 Genocide Convention and analysing responses to purported genocides since the end of Word War II. Karen E. Smith considers why some European governments were hostile to the Genocide Convention and why European governments have been reluctant to use the term genocide to describe atrocities ever since"--Provided by publisher.Summary: "Genocide is one of the most heinous abuses of human rights imaginable, yet reaction to it by European governments in the post-Cold War world has been criticised for not matching the severity of the crime. European governments rarely agree on whether to call a situation genocide, and their responses to purported genocides have often been limited to delivering humanitarian aid to victims and supporting prosecution of perpetrators in international criminal tribunals. More coercive measures - including sanctions or military intervention - are usually rejected as infeasible or unnecessary. This book explores the European approach to genocide, reviewing government attitudes towards the negotiation and ratification of the 1948 Genocide Convention and analysing responses to purported genocides since the end of Word War II. Karen E. Smith considers why some European governments were hostile to the Genocide Convention and why European governments have been reluctant to use the term genocide to describe atrocities ever since"--Provided by publisher.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Holdings
Item type Current library Class number Status Notes Date due Barcode Item reservations
Book-Circulating Book-Circulating Fischer Hall Library
Main shelves 		HV6322.7. S64 2010 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available Purchased with the support of the Nanovic Institute for European Studies. B007953
Total reservations: 0

"Genocide is one of the most heinous abuses of human rights imaginable, yet reaction to it by European governments in the post-Cold War world has been criticised for not matching the severity of the crime. European governments rarely agree on whether to call a situation genocide, and responses to purported genocides have often been limited to delivering humanitarian aid to victims and supporting prosecution of perpetrators in international criminal tribunals. More coercive measures - including sanctions or military intervention - are usually rejected as infeasible or unnecessary. This book explores the European approach to genocide, reviewing government attitudes towards the negotiation and ratification of the 1948 Genocide Convention and analysing responses to purported genocides since the end of Word War II. Karen E. Smith considers why some European governments were hostile to the Genocide Convention and why European governments have been reluctant to use the term genocide to describe atrocities ever since"--Provided by publisher.

"Genocide is one of the most heinous abuses of human rights imaginable, yet reaction to it by European governments in the post-Cold War world has been criticised for not matching the severity of the crime. European governments rarely agree on whether to call a situation genocide, and their responses to purported genocides have often been limited to delivering humanitarian aid to victims and supporting prosecution of perpetrators in international criminal tribunals. More coercive measures - including sanctions or military intervention - are usually rejected as infeasible or unnecessary. This book explores the European approach to genocide, reviewing government attitudes towards the negotiation and ratification of the 1948 Genocide Convention and analysing responses to purported genocides since the end of Word War II. Karen E. Smith considers why some European governments were hostile to the Genocide Convention and why European governments have been reluctant to use the term genocide to describe atrocities ever since"--Provided by publisher.

Includes bibliographical references (p. 260-274) and index.

Machine generated contents note: 1. The norms against genocide; 2. European governments and the development of the international legal framework on genocide; 3. European discourses on genocide during the Cold War; 4. Bosnia and Herzegovina; 5. Rwanda; 6. Kosovo; 7. Darfur; 8. Is there a European way of responding to genocide?