000 03503cam a22005058i 4500
001 NDU01-003946302
005 20170322095439.0
007 ta
008 150204s2015 nju b 001 0 eng
010 _a2014037857
020 _a9780691164755
_q(hardback)
020 _a0691164754
_q(hardback)
020 _a9780691164762
_q(paperback)
020 _a0691164762
_q(paperback)
035 _a(OCoLC)894625395
040 _aDLC
_beng
_erda
_cDLC
_dYDXCP
_dBTCTA
_dBDX
_dOCLCO
_dERASA
_dOCLCF
042 _apcc
049 _aINDU
050 0 0 _aBR115 .P7
_bG79 2015
082 0 0 _a261.7
_223
084 _aREL084000
_aREL108000
_aPOL007000
_aPOL028000
_2bisacsh
100 1 _aGrzymała-Busse, Anna Maria,
_d1970-
245 1 0 _aNations under God :
_bhow churches use moral authority to influence policy /
_cAnna Grzymała-Busse.
263 _a1505
264 1 _aPrinceton :
_bPrinceton University Press,
_c2015.
300 _a421 pages cm
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _aunmediated
_bn
_2rdamedia
338 _avolume
_2rdacarrier
520 _a"In some religious countries, churches have drafted constitutions, restricted abortion, and controlled education. In others, church influence on public policy is far weaker. Why? Nations under God argues that where religious and national identities have historically fused, churches gain enormous moral authority--and covert institutional access. These powerful churches then shape policy in backrooms and secret meetings instead of through open democratic channels such as political parties or the ballot box. Through an in-depth historical analysis of six Christian democracies that share similar religious profiles yet differ in their policy outcomes--Ireland and Italy, Poland and Croatia, and the United States and Canada--Anna Grzymała-Busse examines how churches influenced education, abortion, divorce, stem cell research, and same-sex marriage. She argues that churches gain the greatest political advantage when they appear to be above politics. Because institutional access is covert, they retain their moral authority and their reputation as defenders of the national interest and the common good. Nations under God shows how powerful church officials in Ireland, Canada, and Poland have directly written legislation, vetoed policies, and vetted high-ranking officials. It demonstrates that religiosity itself is not enough for churches to influence politics--churches in Italy and Croatia, for example, are not as influential as we might think--and that churches allied to political parties, such as in the United States, have less influence than their notoriety suggests"--
_cProvided by publisher.
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 _aIntroduction -- Weapons of the meek -- Catholic monopolies -- Post-communist divergence -- Religious pluralism and church influence -- Conclusion : where churches matter -- Appendix: Further tests of the argument.
599 0 1 _anew
_d20150515
599 1 0 _aauth
_d20150515
650 0 _aChristianity and politics.
650 0 _aChurch and state.
650 0 _aDemocracy
_xReligious aspects
_xChristianity.
650 0 _aNationalism
_xReligious aspects
_xChristianity.
852 0 0 _4Hesburgh Library
_5General Collection
949 _aYBPAHESBUGEN01
980 _a20150512
_b29.95
_e26.96
_f40024832398
_g1
_i193351
981 _bEDIAPRV-2015
_vRELIG
983 _b00000032094567
_aInNd
999 _c12309
_d12301